May 21, 2012

US Foreign Assistance

The US is the largest donor of foreign assistance in the world in absolute terms. However, most Americans are unaware that the United States ranks very low in terms of percentage of GDP given in aid. In reality, the US government spends less than 1% of the federal budget on foreign aid—the lowest percentage of all developed nations. Moreover, of the 1.3% of funding designated for diplomacy and development, only 0.6% is set aside for poverty-focused development efforts. Americans spend more than this amount on soda every year.

usaid Underfunding of US global development objectives isn’t the only problem. Our policy to manage these efforts is wildly outdated.US aid policy is based on the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, which empowered the US Agency for International Development to administer US foreign assistance programs. Nearly fifty years on, USAID oversees the distribution of less than half of all US foreign aid, and The Foreign Assistance Act, now littered with amendments and, fails to articulate a cohesive strategy or provide  strong guidance in US global development initiatives.

Update** – On February 14th 2011, President Obama announced his proposed federal budget for FY2012. The proposed budget has allocated $47 billion for the State Department and USAID, a 1% increase from the 2010 budget. The Republican driven Appropriations Committee have rejected this request and have submitted a continued resolution proposal that hopes to reduce the budgets of the State Department and USAID by 23% to 2008 levels, and possibly worse by 33% to 2006 levels. The debate over these agencies budgets and final federal budget will take place over the next few weeks. Updates will be provided as decisions are made… **

What are the problems with existing US foreign assistance?

  • Too many players – Though USAID is theoretically in charge of US foreign assistance projects, politicians and presidents have often sidestepped the Foreign Assistance Act in order to forward their personal aid goals. This has greatly decentralized authority in the foreign assistance arena; the Department of Defense, State Department, Treasury Department, Health and Human Services Department, and dozens of agencies now play a role in aid dispersal.
  • Too many goals – With so many players involved—and thus many different end goals—US aid policy contains no cohesive strategy or focus. The Foreign Assistance Act outlines several dozen goals and hundreds of directives but establishes no overarching strategy for aid projects that achieve them.
  • Too little accountability – Because USAID oversees the dispersal of only a fraction of foreign assistance funds, there is no way to guarantee that money isn’t wasted or diverted into the coffers of middlemen and contractors. USAID also lacks the capacity and directive to investigate successes and failures or weigh the impacts of different foreign assistance approaches.
  • Unsustainable approaches to development – Funneling taxpayer dollars into corrupt governments and contracted development corporations accomplishes little. Without engaging communities and allowing them to identify and build upon their own solutions, foreign aid can’t hope to achieve sustainable development. Additionally, too little attention is currently dedicated to improving education systems and the health of women and girls, two primary paths to sustainable development. Instead, we have seen weakly targeted and ineffective US foreign assistance that creates dependency, allows domestic businesses to stagnate, allows for entrenched corruption and pushes impoverished communities to rely increasingly on charity.
  • Implement the U.S. Global Development Policy – President Obama’s Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) on Global Development, the first of its kind by a U.S. administration, provides clear policy guidance to all U.S. Government agencies regarding Global Development and enumerates the administration’s core objectives, operational model, and describes the modern architecture needed to implement this policy.
  • Create an Inter-Agency Policy for Global Development – By ensuring transparency, clear communication and a defined strategy between key departments, foreign assistance programs can be streamlined, strengthened, and coordinated under specifically designated goals. An Inter-Agency Policy would greatly increase effectiveness and informed decision-making.
  • Strengthen and reinvigorate USAID – USAID leadership under Raj Shah and staff is developing in line with both the PPD goals and a re-envisioned 3D U.S. National Security Strategy, based on Defense, Development and Diplomacy.  We call for an in-depth analysis of the inherent conflict using existing structures and resources within the 3D approach, and we support the new USAID values and goals of local capacity building, selective at scale investments, accountability of public-private partnerships, country ownership and strengthening multilateral capacities.
  • Follow the developments of the Global Partnerships Act- Existing US Foreign Assistance spending is governed by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. This piece of legislation is outdated beyond belief, and it is time for Foreign Aid spending to be managed under a law that takes into account changing world dynamics, south-south partnerships, new media, new threats to freedom, declining biodiversity, food insecurity and a growing population.

What you can do 

  • Show a movie discussing the issue. Check out our film library for a list of free films you can borrow from AIDemocracy. Films come with discussion guides and free shipping. It couldn’t be any easier!
  • Organize an event on your campus. Bring in a speaker. Organize a debate. Stand up and demand change. Check out our event database for some great ideas to get you started.
  • Request a mini-grant to make your film or event a success. We provide small grants to help pay for materials, food and speakers. Contact us to discuss.
  • Speak out to the network. Write a blog for our site. Post something on our Facebook group. Share photos or video with us on YouTube. Share your opinions with other concerned students like you. Here’s how to submit materials.
  • Ask for advice and support. Not sure how to get started? Need to talk through ideas for your event? AIDemocracy staff and student leaders are here to help
  • And more…

Read more on this topic ...

The US withdrawal from Afghanistan: bad news for aid agencies

According to announcements in November of 2011, the US will withdraw 30,000 troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2013. Other NATO countries will withdraw 10,000 altogether. However, negative effects of this withdrawal are already felt in multiple areas, aid being one of them. Whether the Afghani government is able to take on these projects is questionable. Many aid agencies suffer losses as a result of the decreased US military presence. Financial allocation to aid agencies in Afghanistan decreased from $4 bn to $2 bn. CARE and Mercy Corps are some … [Read more...]

Re-evaluating US-Pakistan relations

While Islamabad and its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) have historically served as American allies, Pakistan’s tense relations with the American government and military as well as with the Karzai regime have forced America to reevaluate U.S.-Pakistan relations. America’s approximately $20 billion in military and economic aid since 9/11 have served to support Pakistan’s weak government, incentivize Pakistan and its intelligence agency to combat terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban, deter nuclear war between India and … [Read more...]

Current Debate on Foreign Aid: What’s in it for women?

Consider these facts: Every minute, one woman dies from a pregnancy-related complication Every day, 1500 women die from complications of pregnancy and childbirth Every year, approximately half a million women die from maternal causes 99% of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries Now consider the major killers: Severe bleeding Infections and Hypertensive disorders Obstructed labor Complications due to unsafe abortions Pre-pregnancy untreated diseases such as malaria, anemia and HIV. Lack of access to adequate … [Read more...]

Securing America’s Leadership in a Changing World: the impact of proposed cuts to foreign aid

In a letter to the United States Senate on October 14, 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton asked for assistance in securing America’s global presence and leadership and requested that cuts to foreign aid be spared. In this time of constant change and upheaval, it is obvious that Congress faces tough choices. Foreign policy may seem distant from everyday concerns, but our civilian presence around the world delivers real benefits to the American people. The Department of State and USAID make up one percent of the entire federal budget. … [Read more...]

AIDemocracy Hunger Team makes case for foreign aid to supercommittee

The AIDemocracy Food Security Campaign Team sent this letter to Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) on October 14th to influence the supercommittee discussions about foreign aid. The supercommittee is currently debating proposals for over $1 trillion in US budget cuts over the coming years. Team members requested that cuts to foreign aid in the 2012 budget are spared, and asked that international programs that fight global issues such as hunger be placed in high priority: Dear Senator Murray: On behalf of Americans for Informed Democracy (AIDemocracy), a … [Read more...]

Get Your House Rep. to Support Cutting Spending on Nuclear Weapons TODAY!

Here are some stats that may surprise you: Every year the US spends more than $30 billion maintaining the country’s arsenal of nuclear weapons. Today, the nuclear arsenal still exceeds 5,000 warheads. According to estimates, the US is expected to spend over $700 billion (you read that right, $700 billion!) over the next ten years to maintain weapons that were built during the Cold War, a war that's been over for more than 20 years. Representative Ed Markey (MA-7) has written a “Dear Colleague” letter to his fellow representatives asking … [Read more...]

Are you ready? It’s time to change the world.

Last month, USAID launched a new “Youth Impact” initiative to acknowledge the powerful role that today’s young people can--and do--play in global development. According to the program's new site, "America's youth understand and care more about development than ever before, inspired by the chance to drive meaningful change and eager to use their skills to help those in greatest need," and I couldn't agree more! My only question is, why did it take them so long? Throughout history, young adults around the world have proven themselves to be agents … [Read more...]

G8 Summit Recap: Does the Arab Spring mean an African Drought?

The declarations resulting from last week’s G8 Summit in Deauville, France include commitments to shared ideals and concrete measures in issues ranging from the environment and the internet to security and trade. However, as predicted, the recent democratic uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa were one of the most prominent topics featured in the talks between the Group of 8 (the leaders representing the 8 strongest economies in the world), with drastic implications for international cooperation on foreign aid and development. As the main … [Read more...]

What do you want to see from the upcoming G8 Summit?

This week, the leaders of the world’s eight most powerful economies—known as the Group of 8 or G8—will meet in Deauville, France, for the 37th annual G8 Summit. The G8, which includes France, the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, Germany, Japan, Italy and Canada, was initially formed in 1975 to respond to the worldwide recession created by the first oil crisis. Since then, the G8 Summit has been a forum for these nations to come together to address global economic issues. Over time, that discussion has evolved to include matters such as … [Read more...]

Universal Declaration of Economic Rights: A New World Order?

Critics have attempted to expose the inefficiencies of the Bretton Woods system that caters to countries that have the most money and consequently most voting power. Multi-lateral funding agencies are under fire for perpetuating their own standards of multilateralism that favor founding members or developed countries. The obvious and consistent divide between rich and poor countries and lending and indebted countries continues to fuel the impression that the once admired Bretton Woods system falls short of capturing the true essence of international … [Read more...]